To: TigersEye
Doesnt 10,000 tons sound a little high for a rock 45 ft. across? I dont know how to do the math to determine the density for that. Yet they say it wasnt dense like nickel or iron.
10,000 tons is roughly the same as a WWII cruiser, and a bit more than a modern Arleigh Burke-class Destroyer. At 45' across it had to be dense as all hell ...
To: tanknetter
At 45' across it had to be dense as all hell ... Dense enough to be an Obama voter?
92 posted on
02/16/2013 7:07:26 AM PST by
COBOL2Java
(Fighting Obama without Boehner & McConnell is like going deer hunting without your accordion)
To: tanknetter; TigersEye
Assume a spherical rock. At r = 22.5’, V = 47,713 ft^cu, or about 1800 cu yds in round numbers.
Concrete density is around 2 tons per yard, so there is 3600 tons. So we’d need some rock significantly more dense that concrete.
By the way, I did the math on 10,000 tons at 40,000 mph, and that comes out to 346,000 tons of TNT worth of kinetic energy.
94 posted on
02/16/2013 7:16:16 AM PST by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
To: tanknetter
The destroyer displaces 10,000 tons of water, which has a lower density than most of the asteroid (Earth’s density is about 4 times that of Jupiter, for example).
145 posted on
02/23/2013 10:39:31 AM PST by
SunkenCiv
(Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson