Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

I don’t really care if they have my information.

What I am arguing for is each time my information transfers from my machine to another, that is a taxable event. Then from another machine to the next, that is a taxable event. Whoever owns the machine that receives my information must pay my income tax. If enough machines receive my information, I may end up paying no income tax at all. The feds might even get a surplus in tax payments.

I get to know who has my information, because they have to report the taxable event. If you don’t want to pay tax - don’t collect my information.


8 posted on 02/12/2013 6:26:04 PM PST by frithguild (You can call me Snippy the Anti-Freeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: frithguild

That is a very good idea, if it could be limited to that. But I see great danger in that resulting in an “electronic data transfer tax”, on far more things.

Imagine if the government got a penny for every Google search, or course Google being by subscription only, and a nickel a search. Or it cost a penny to look at FR, and a penny to look at every link from FR.

A penny of tax every time we used a credit card or made an electronic bank transfer. Already the UN has proposed an international financial transfer tax, to fund the UN.

As ridiculous sounding as I could make these, I’m sure that some greedy government employee could make them much worse.


11 posted on 02/13/2013 6:14:53 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Best WoT news at rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson