Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti gunners: Taking Advantage of Tragedy?
Clash Daily ^ | February 4, 2013 | R.G. Yoho

Posted on 02/05/2013 5:24:58 AM PST by Clintons-B-Gone

The recent Congressional testimony of former congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords reminded me of another incident where a spouse willingly allowed their loved one to become a damaged pawn in the crusade to outlaw legal gun ownership.

In 1981, I was just returning to my college dormitory after classes that day, when one of my friends came running up to me and said President Reagan had been shot.

(Excerpt) Read more at clashdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: guncontrol; newtown; sandyhoook; secondamendment
I think it's creepy to use your wounded spouse to advance a cause that person might not have supported before the attack.
1 posted on 02/05/2013 5:25:08 AM PST by Clintons-B-Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Clintons-B-Gone

It is rather telling that a dedicated Republican converted to being pro gun control after significant brain damage.


2 posted on 02/05/2013 5:32:31 AM PST by Oberon (Big Brutha Be Watchin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintons-B-Gone
Anti gunners: Taking Advantage of Tragedy?

Do fat pigs fart?

3 posted on 02/05/2013 5:34:11 AM PST by MuttTheHoople (Pray for Joe Biden- Proverbs 29:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintons-B-Gone
Anti gunners: Taking Advantage of Tragedy?

Do fat pigs fart?

4 posted on 02/05/2013 5:35:05 AM PST by MuttTheHoople (Pray for Joe Biden- Proverbs 29:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintons-B-Gone

I heard her speech on NPR no fewer than 15 times in two days on NPR. Every time I felt terrible for her for exactly the reason the article mentions.

If one was against cars they could easily find someone brain damaged in a car accident. If they could get that person to make the EXACT SAME SPEECH that she gave, only about cars instead of guns, it would have the same effect on me: None, other than to pity her for being used by others.

This is also what liberals do.


5 posted on 02/05/2013 5:41:39 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Well said!


6 posted on 02/05/2013 5:45:51 AM PST by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Clintons-B-Gone

If someone tells you that they don’t own a gun, because the police will protect them, then ask them if they own a fire extinguisher.
I own a fire extinguishe, because too much damage would occur waiting for firemen to arrive.
I own a gun, because I don’t want to be killed or members of my family to be killed waiting for police to come from a 911 call.


7 posted on 02/05/2013 6:25:05 AM PST by BuffaloJack (Children, pets, and slaves get taken care of. Free Men take care of themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintons-B-Gone

How about Cindy Sheehan, who though her son rejected her radicalism, and joined the military, and she rejected him as well for his service, once he was dead, she was more than happy to wave his “bloody shirt”(*) around?

(*) “Waving the bloody shirt” goes all the way back to Shakespeare, in Julius Caesar, but in American history “the phrase gained popularity with a fictitious incident in which Benjamin Franklin Butler of Massachusetts, when making a speech on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives, allegedly held up a shirt stained with the blood of a carpetbagger whipped by the Ku Klux Klan. (While Butler did give a speech condemning the Klan, he never waved anyone’s bloody shirt.)”


8 posted on 02/05/2013 6:39:12 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Best WoT news at rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintons-B-Gone
Gabby like guns! See Gabby smile! "Bang!Bang!"


9 posted on 02/05/2013 7:36:49 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Click my name! See new paintings!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintons-B-Gone
Every time the liberals wheeled that poor man out in front of the public, they reminded me of the old black and white jungle pictures where the witch doctor shakes this doll at the people and scare the daylights out of them. The liberals hoped he'd have the same effect on the public, and for a while, it did. Now he's been replaced by Giffords.

There is one side benefit to some though - these "in memory of" organizations that spring up in response to these tragedies create some nice six-figure a year positions, that, like the TV evangelists, always need annual refreshing, even though 90% or so is eaten up in "administrative purposes".

In 2010, the Brady Bunch took in $3-million plus and spent $1.8 in salaries and "fundraising fees" and $1.2 million in "other expenses".

See Reports.

10 posted on 02/05/2013 7:55:45 AM PST by Oatka (This is America. Assimilate or evaporate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson