Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: theBuckwheat

“What part of “shall not be infringed” is so hard to understand? For that matter, the same question could be asked of a number of well-written passages in the Constitution.”

Got it. Really. Now you need to go back and see how the Supreme Court has chipped away at the Tenth Amendment over the last 70 years, so you will understand about infringement. Me? I don’t think it is hard to understand. But SCOTUS does.

A new Tenth Amendment could be written very, very specifically to overthrow SCOTUS decisions over the last 70 years, and reinvigorate the rights of the States. If specific, the Amendment would be incapable of being modified by SCOTUS, the way it was in the 1940s with the Interstate Commerce ruling about wheat — from there it has been all downhill.


33 posted on 02/01/2013 3:59:43 PM PST by Nabber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Nabber

You read my mind. The Tenth sprang to my mind as well. I started to think about enumerating all the ways that the SCOTUS has mooted the enumerated powers, but then thought it best to writing a post that just touched on the theme because a lot of FReepers would just need a little prompting to know where I was going.


35 posted on 02/01/2013 4:16:56 PM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson