I would have prefered it stayed with the muslims.
Seems another term could have been used for the “dawgs”.
But, times change.
Thanks for note.
Well, I guess I see it working because the press mentality of sticking their heads in the sand, is the same in both types of stories. I think that’s why - because people saw the obvious connection in the way these two events were being reported.
I really remember I took note that the press started to not mention anything racial or ethnic if they can avoid it. But generally if they report a name, if it’s obvious, it’s obvious without them having to say anything.