I don’t view Taitz and her followers as you do. I believe that with the job Obama and his enablers have done to obfuscate his history any light on such is like the drip-drip of a water pipe that will eventually lead to the big leak. There are quite a few others that push the same agenda as Taitz from their own baseline and perspective. I tend to believe that all these people including Taitz are honest and wanting the best for the USA as to It’s Constitutional foundation and are willing to give more effort for such a goal than others. As for me they should not be derided as long as they are on a patriot’s true and legitimate path. They are no more fools than other persons I look to for honest information.
I sent $$ to Taitz until there were claims that I found to be credible that she had asked two witnesses to give false testimony and also she went off on a federal judge in an extremely foolish and legally suicidal manner.
Although I am not an attorney, I spent 5 years in civil court in Texas contesting custody and I picked up enough law to realize that, in fact, Taitz does NOT understand our Constitution or the difference between civil and criminal law.
The fact that the CA Bar has not disbarred her is proof of the corruption and crony-oriented protection of that bar.
Yes, at times simply on the matter of explaining the original meaning of NBC, Taitz has articulated the issue well on TV, but her manic persona and incompetent legal filings pushing the wrong claims in the wrong court with the wrong plaintiff undermines the credibility of “birthers” (constitutionalists) and has invited nationwide derision of same.
Also, nearly every time another activist gets in front of a judge anywhere in the country, Taitz zooms in and tries to grab the microphone and spotlight almost always with a half-baked court filing as well.
Bottom line: Taitz is not helping true patriots use the courts given to we the people in our Constitution, she is undermining use of the courts.