Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Ripping good, read it all
1 posted on 01/23/2013 4:33:47 PM PST by virgil283
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: virgil283

http://www.docmercury.com/gallery/the-bismarck

watch the video


2 posted on 01/23/2013 4:38:25 PM PST by virgil283 ( *- Never give the devil a ride. He will always want to drive.-*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283
Bismarck had 88 large guns, the biggest with a range of over 35 miles

no more than 20 could be classed (charitably) as large. And the main battery had a range of at best 20 miles (22½ if firing over land)

3 posted on 01/23/2013 4:47:51 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (I think, therefore I am what I yam, and that's all I yam - "Popeye" Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KecIdlEAKhU


4 posted on 01/23/2013 4:50:46 PM PST by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283

I think the Bismark was strongly constructed but probably not the most powerful ship ever. I know it had 15 inch guns but the American Iowa class and even the slightly older ones had 16 inch guns.

The Japanese Yamato and Musahshi had 18 inch main battery. I recall that a single torpedo almost sunk her due to a flaw in the armor. That was corrected and after that she was probably the most powerful of any battleship.


5 posted on 01/23/2013 5:06:03 PM PST by yarddog (One shot one miss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283

Bismarck was a good battleship, but far from the best ever built. She was definitely outclassed be the Yamatos and Iowas. She may not even have been the equal of the South Dakotas.

But the point of the article is well-taken. She received her decisive wound from a slow, obsolete biplane. Proof that the battlship, without air cover, was an obsolete wepons system in its own right.


6 posted on 01/23/2013 5:11:14 PM PST by henkster ("The people who count the votes decide everything." -Joseph Stalin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283

A little pluck, a little ingenuity, and a lot faith—Traits that characterized the America I grew-up in.

And my kids wonder why I’m so disgusted the the current “leadership” of the Republican Party.


8 posted on 01/23/2013 5:40:35 PM PST by Arm_Bears (Ted Kennedy's Oldsmobile has killed more people than my guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283
Because of the Swordfish's ultra-slow speed, the automatic anti-aircraft tracking devices couldn't get a bead on them and not one of the fifteen Swordfish was shot down.

This is garbage.

The Bismarck is one of the most overrated ships in naval history. Many of its design characteristics were obsolete and left over from end-of-WWI designs.

The Bismarck had a fairly weak anti-aircraft armament that was NOT up-to-date, was poorly coordinated, had faulty equipment, and the crew was not well trained in anti-aircraft fire.

The assertion that the Swordfish were "too slow" to hit is idiotic.

9 posted on 01/23/2013 6:00:58 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283
Bismarck also deployed the latest anti-torpedo devices, from cannon to depth charges, so an actual hit was expected to be somewhat rare.

Man, I missed this. This is even more stupid and reveals that the author knows nothing about naval warfare.

In World War II, the only "anti-torpedo" device were nets, deployed around stationary ships in port. Other than that, all you could do is maneuver to avoid them (despite extremely rare incidences of torpedoes being shot). You couldn't use "cannons" or "depth charges" to stop a torpedo in the water.

10 posted on 01/23/2013 6:03:22 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283
Was the Bismarck actually sunk? Here's a statement of doubt.
12 posted on 01/23/2013 7:12:30 PM PST by Fiji Hill (Io Triumphe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283

This my friends is how we can spot liberal progressive thinking, they cannot tell the truth, everything is hyped, inflated and incorrect, a lie living in fantasyland.

Anothere lesson of how to spot liberal propaganda.

I know the real facts of this story, but somebody has an agenda to rewrite history.

Just like an Obama groupie.


13 posted on 01/23/2013 7:21:36 PM PST by Eye of Unk (AR2 2013 is the American Revolution part 2 of 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson