No one else is still reading the thread. Well except for you.
You can’t seem to get the notion through your head that I did not make ANY claims about the 1961 - not 1960 -the 1961 revised VSIM, having anything to do with ANYTHING other than regarding obamas birth certificate.
That relationship was born from Corsi via The Daily Pen code chart, and Corsi had Zullo publicly make statements as “facts” when there was nothing to support those “facts”.
Your 1960 report doesn’t even factor into anything I worked on. At all, or in any way. IT DOES NOT MATTER. Why do you keep inserting a 1960 manual into the conversation?
Read carefully: I searched for the VSIM because of the growing controversy about whether the code chart shown on the screen at Zullos presser was in fact from the 1961 fed. VSIM. All of the little side arguments were/are stupid distractions.
Zullo had stated as a fact that the code chart he was showing was the one used to determine which code numbers WENT ON OBAMAS BIRTH CERTIFICATE.
We found out that was not true.
The FEDERAL code chart, the FEDERAL manuals, and the FEDERAL reports have zero, zip, nada, relationship to the code numbers that were ON OBAMAS BIRTH CERTIFICATE.
That was the information that I was after. Even Zullo admitted that he had not wanted to use Corsi’s scripting about those codes because he felt the evidence to support that was too weak.
You keep trying to imply that I was misrepresenting something. It’s weird this thing you are doing.
I looked for that 61 VSIM because of the chart controversy and the obots claiming that Zullo knowingly lied - Dr. Conspiracy also claimed that he was told no 61 VSIM existed. One had to have existed so I asked around and was directed to the CDC. No big mystery. Dr. Consp. DID have a 68 VSIM which had a chart just like the one used on The Daily Pen - which was the one used in Corsi’s presentation given by Zullo.
What my research did: 1)simply proved that those penciled codes were not applied from a federal VSIM. 2)The federal manual was not used to determine the race of the PARENTS. 3)That some states used a state specific code manual at the local levels and applied the penciled codes at the local offices prior to the birth certificates being microfilmed. 4)There was A 61 VSIM still in existence,revised or otherwise. 5) The chart shown at the Corsi/Zullo presser was almost certainly from a 68 VSIM. 6) That the 1961 federal VSIM was completely irrelevant in regards to THE PENCILED CODES ON OBAMAS BIRTH CERTIFICATE.
That was the information I was after. There, do you understand it now? Corsi pushed the meme that the parents race was determined by the fed code books, but it wasn’t, so the fed codes didn’t matter on that point. The fed books explained how to code the childs race by the information contained in the race fields on the birth certificates. Did the reports have ANY data on the parents business? No.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/52923
FYI - excerpt:
RB: The instructions seemed very specific. Infiltrate web forums, collect screen names, avatars, and posters’ tag lines, and attempt to resolve these to their actual identities. I read one paragraph that listed circumstances when the “asset” was only to monitor but do not disrupt without authorization. There was another section titled “Divert, Disrupt and Destroy,” listing “how to’s” in certain cases.
There was also a section on maintaining a social media presence, and another on the most effective use of Twitter.
Lastly, there was a “reference section,” which included statistics, specific language to use to marginalize different posters, and effective methods to discredit people while maintaining a sense of legitimacy.
It was surreal, to say the least.
Oh, one more thing that’s important. As I said, these “kids,” or young people I believe, are known collectively as “Cyber-Warriors for Obama.” The subheading was “And the truth shall set you free.” Truth? Really? They were hired on their hacking abilities, or more precisely on their abilities to make postings through proxy servers and effectively use alternate identities and multiple e-mail addresses. Their purpose is to spread disinformation, not truth.