Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: CodeToad

Like Ms. Publius said, it would not be ex post facto, because the law will be to “turn in your gun.” You won’t be committing a “crime” until you refuse to turn in your gun, because you would not be charged for formerly possessing the gun, but for not turning it in.


3 posted on 01/15/2013 11:12:18 AM PST by WXRGina (Further up and further in!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: WXRGina

None of that matters anyway, because the answer will be “NO”.


5 posted on 01/15/2013 11:15:27 AM PST by Mich Patriot (PITCH BLACK is the new "transparent")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: WXRGina

“because the law will be to “turn in your gun.” “

No, the law will be “possession of”, not “turn in”. Besidesm “turn in” also then gets into other issues of being paid market value.


9 posted on 01/15/2013 11:21:02 AM PST by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson