[Navy Patriot]

While you make several excellent points, I was merely commenting on the irony of inexperienced freedom loving men voting themselves into prison. I used some very loose and unreliable exit "polling" from 2007 to come up with a conversational number, and posed the comment as a question because of the shotgun accuracy it contained.

However, your excellent comment should be rewritten to generalize slightly, and posted on voting, election and vote fraud threads. It is applicable to all those discussions, and not just Jewish voting indicators.

Well done.

[Spaulding]

Thanks Navy Patriot. I was not at all meaning any criticism. The progressives play for keeps. That, I suspect, is why only one Congressman, Nathan Deal of Georgia, dared raise the eligibility issue. The White House responded to Deal’s open letter with ethics charges, which no private citizen has the means to fight. Deal resigned and became Governor of Georgia. Politics may turn on the sovereignty rights of states. Our Constitution has been relegated to providing occasional talking points.

I will never forget the justice department's crucifiction of Scooter Libby for exposing Valerie Plame, charges brought after Colin Powell's deputy Richard Armitage confessed to having informed the press of Plame’s CIA involvement. Did Powell, who certainly knew, say anything? Powell is a Holder ally, Obama supporter, and now, Chuck Hagel advocate. Sadly, this dirty business occurred during the G.W. Bush administration, and George refused to grant a complete dismissal of charges, even after all knew Libby was innocent. (There may be some legal limitation, such as the president's limitations that I'm missing - a president may not be able to dismiss charges, but I'll plead ignorance; George should have defended Libby). They got Libby by comparing trivia, about whom no one was certain - where, when, how many times - from Libby and a TV commentator, and nice man but an alcoholic, many of whose memories were a blur, and deciding that Libby had lied.

Our pundits know better, but know the potential for a corrupt government to ruin their lives. Holder would have put Swartz in jail, and possibly, as with Jonathan Pollard, lost the key. We have had spies who released critical defense information, and were caught, released during the time Pollard still sits in prison for passing threat assessments affecting Israel that our military had chosen to keep from our strongest ally in the Middle East. Swartz didn't have the constitution of G. Gordon Liddy, and petty henchmen in Justice knew he was vulnerable. His information was no more threatening than the silly movie Hillary used to excuse withdrawing security for our Ambassador in Libya.

I did chose to respond in particular to your comment about Jewish voters because the fraud of our non-existent verifiable voting system affects every issue. Until more understand that the foundation of our republic has been compromised, it will not be fixed. There are threads dealing with vote fraud, but voting fraud colors every political discussion, and more so when so few grasp that it has been completely co-opted by the left. That is what Acorn is about. That is what Obama is about. That is why Obama’s cadre knew that debate performances were irrelevant. That is why the left knew it didn't need to worry when twenty thousand appeared for Romney rallies when two hundred, mostly union hires, for Obama rallies.