Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Responsibility2nd
So. The Supremes will hear arguments? 4 years too late but whatever.

Not even that, I'm afraid. This docket entry does not mean that the Court has agreed to hear argument. Rather, the application has been submitted for consideration in "conference," as happens with essentially all filings submitted to the Court. As a practical matter, there's no reason to think that the application will even be discussed for a moment before it is effectively denied.

In short, this most recent docket action means nothing.

15 posted on 01/11/2013 8:44:30 PM PST by DSH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: DSH
Not even that, I'm afraid. This docket entry does not mean that the Court has agreed to hear argument. Rather, the application has been submitted for consideration in "conference," as happens with essentially all filings submitted to the Court. As a practical matter, there's no reason to think that the application will even be discussed for a moment before it is effectively denied.

In short, this most recent docket action means nothing.

Somehow, I'm not surprised.

Before the Examiner, I'm betting this came from Taitz herself. I've seen her overstate the news before.

Even the news that comes from birthers is BS.

37 posted on 01/12/2013 12:32:08 AM PST by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson