Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DesertRhino
"Why?? For the same reason we retired the F-14s and A6-E’s"

Don't get me started on the F-14, especially the F-14D. When fully tricked out with LANTIRN, the Navy finally got a true multi-role, all-weather fighter/bomber that could go full air-to-air for fleet defense and also drop precision munitions like the Intruder.

Back in the day I participated a military exercise with some F-14Ds. Their capability was unreal.

Then the powers that be dumped it.

What a tremendous waste.

18 posted on 01/09/2013 9:06:27 PM PST by magellan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: magellan

I believe you on that. There’s realistically nothing foreign that can tangle with them. They could address threats at speeds and distances that super hornets could only dream of.
And that bombing capability was something else. They have had a fantasy that one airframe can do everything a carrier needs.

The truth is, a carrier air wing has but a shadow of the air-to-air and strike capability it did before they improved everything for the sake of procurement officer careers.


23 posted on 01/09/2013 10:36:13 PM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: magellan

when the f-14 shut down after flight, you had to roll out the 55 gallon drums on wheels to catch the leaking hydraulic fluid... when those seals shrunk, it left behind a helluva mess..


28 posted on 01/10/2013 4:37:43 AM PST by joe fonebone (The clueless... they walk among us, and they vote...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson