No, you did not rationally address them. You wrote off as nonexistent both the profusion of civilian "law enforcement" entities and the entire US military. You did so with no factual support, and used it to present a naively optimistic POV that IMO is dangerous. It certainly has been very dangerous to folks in the past.
Then, you responded to comment and criticism in a very brittle and personally offensive manner, which speaks ill both of you and of the position you're trying to hold.
The worst part of this is that in the main, I agree with you ... yet all you have accomplished in direct conversation is to convince me that you're a person to be avoided and not to be trusted.
Check your attitude ... it's not doing you any good.
Yes I did, with numbers, historical fact and personal experience. You essentially called me a liar in your opening salvo.
"The worst part of this is that in the main, I agree with you"
That's really the worst part huh ? You agree with me but go ahead and put all these unfounded doubts into people's minds during the middle of a psycholoigal warefare attack by domestic enemies ? Did you picket and protest the "Why We Fight" series during WWII too ? (yes I am questioning your age)
"...convince me that you're a person to be avoided"
Don't worry we're not likely to run into one another at the opera.