Every time an incident like this comes up, it’s the perfect time to discuss gun control.
Like how gun free zones are killing fields. Like having nobody allowd to have weapons to protect anyone in/around the school makes no sense when you’re dealing with murderers who don’t care about any laws - or lives, for that matter.
Like how a PERSON’S INTENT is what makes them dangerous, not whether they have a gun or not. Trying to break the stupid arguments and slogans of the left at times like this are critical because that’s what the usually sheeple folks are thinking about and talking about. Trying to get them to understand it’s the stupid disarming policies of law-abiding people that leave such people helpless to criminals - who have intent (INTENT) to do evil things of all sorts - that requires immediate countering of the left’s even more idiotic comments.
Like explaining why anyone should feel safer because they, their parents, their sons and daughters, are disarmed but the criminals will still have their weapons?
Like if we have rights to inane things like free birth control and abortion, free obamaphones, etc, surely we have a right to life - and inherent in that right to life, the right to self defense to preserve that life, up to lethal force to stop someone from killing us?
Like if the left really believes this, lets disarm all police, disarm the secret service, the military, and all the elite left’s bodyguards who can afford to pay someone else to carry a gun for them. Let’s disarm the Capitol police force and all security officers across government. FBI, DEA, ATF, IRS - no more guns for you guys. All police and sheriffs - no more guns. We’ll all be safer. Look how many less guns there will be to hurt others.
The left can’t just go unchallenged and have 100% control of the dialogue at these times. They aren’t shutting up and we shouldn’t either. It’s the BEST TIME to debate and have a chance to get people to really see disarmament only gets unarmed law-abiding people killed by criminals with murderous intent.
REFRAME THE ARGUMENT. We have to every time. It’s the INTENT of the person with the gun. There’s no problems with law-abiding people having any kind of gun they want. That’s not who’s doing this. They place the blame for this on every other person than the criminal herself (or himself).
And when you discuss this, use the female pronoun first, the libs like doing that - but onlyfor positive statements, we can see how they like it when it’s done for negative statements.
EXCELLANT POST!!!!!!!!!
This HAS been a golden opportunity in disguise...It is WE who “have not let this crisis go to waste.” We have been front and center and done a good job this time reframing this whole issue...eg, La Piere of NRA on Sun news show today. Can you imagine....
1. The phrase now in the media: “gun free zones”
2. News anchors now saying ,”Well, uh, there really is confusion about what ‘assault weapon ‘means”
3. should we arm teachers or have armed guards?
4. What should we do about mentally ill people?
etc.
I have spent a lot of time talking to and sending educational emails to many friends!