To: driftless2
"You know what I think pal? I think you and all the other Birthers are hired plants for the Dems to try to make gullible conservatives think you know something and make Pubbies look stupid. You don't know anything. If you honestly think anything positive is going to come from this latest farce, you're taking very powerful drugs and/or you believe little green men from Mars are going to proclaim you dictator of the solar system. Which one is it?"
Well, I'm a 'birther', and I don't have a clue what the truth is. But what I do know is, is that Obama's entire life has been filled with typos!
From the time Obama first had a litereary agent, until the time he decided to run for President, his bio with the literary agennt claimed Obama was "born in Kenya, and raised in Indonesia, and Hawaii". Reason, agency has claimed it was a 'typo'.
Obama's Columbia records, along with all of his college records, have not been released. But you can verify that Obama did in fact graduate from Columbia. And with that confirmation, you receive the dates Obama attended Columbia. Obama has claimed to have have attended Columbia for 2 years, but the records from Columbia say he only attended for 1 year. Reason for discrepancy, Columbia claims it was a 'typo'.
The Social Security Administration, until very recently, would assign Social Security Numbers, based apon the return address of the Social Security Number application form. Obama released his SSN with his tax returns, when he put them on the White House website. This SSN is one that was assigned for a return address in Connecticut, yet Obama has no reason to have had his SSN mailed to Connecticut. Reason for this discrepancy? Again, supporters claim a typo on the ZIP code.
Obama's Selective Service registration was released via a Freedom of Information Act request. These registrations were filled out at the local post office, and were stamped with the post offices offical pika stamp. For some reason, on Obama's application, the pika stamp only contains the last two digits of the year, even though the pika stamps contain all 4 digits of the year - ie. '80' instead of '1980'. Explanation by supporters, the stamp was worn, and the century digits did not print, even though other registrations from the same post office, found from within days Obama's was processed, show all 4 digits fine. And coincidentally, Obama's stamp is identical to one where the year '2008' was used, and the '20' cut off, and the '08' inverted to make '80'. Also, when this is done, it shows the '80' slightly moved towards the outside of the stamp - this is because the gap between the two 0's in 2008, is less than the border after the last 0 in 1980. On Obama's registration, the year '80' is moved to the outside of the stamp, exactly like when the cut off '08' is inverted from the '2008' stamp. This one is particularly important, because existing federal law states that anyone who is required to register with the Selective Service, and fails to do so, is automatically ineligible for employment with the executive branch of the federal government.
You are right, there is no concrete evidence that Obama is not eligible for office. But I find it beyond the pale that people criticize others for challenging it, when it appears that EVERY piece of evidence that people claim shows 'birthers' to be 'gullible', has such coincidences.
81 posted on
12/03/2012 9:14:33 AM PST by
MMaschin
To: MMaschin
Every minute spent wasting time trying to prove Obama is ineligible is time that could be spent on working with other people to make sure we get a conservative candidate for president next time. I’m astounded that would-be rational people seriously believe they’re going to oust Obama out of office. It’s not going to happen.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson