“No, this was a quiet revolution of culture that took place with the express if not tacit support of our RINOs and those chickens are coming home to roost with a squawking vengeance. Think Bushes’ “compassionate conservatism” and Simpson-Mazzoli amnesty among ideas to be blamed for this rot.”
This is the point I am trying to make. Conflict, attacking Liberals, and the creation and connection of aversive stimulus to Liberals, develops the amygdala.
Amygdala development has been shown to be associated with a Conservative ideology. So if you get weak-kneed guys like Bush running the party who won’t do the conflict thing becasue it’s not nice, the public’s amygdalae atrophies, and fails to develop, and they stay more Liberal in their neurological development and ideology.
Ramp up the conflict, and you actually develop a brain structure that sees it’s development is associated with Conservatism.
I’m just technically explaining why Republicans shouldn’t try to appeal to voters, so much as make Liberalsim repulse voters.
Again, it is a geeky piece designed to appeal to a narrow audience.
I have called it bar language before, for lack of better word skills, I can walk into an Hispanic, or a workmans bar and explain to the guys why liberals and liberalism are the last thing any man should be associated with.
The same applies to Christian Hispanics and blacks, a conservative should be able to describe liberalism in a way that they know that only satan worshipers would vote democrat.