>Well done.
Thank you.
>Your amygdalae-related explanation fogs the point you’re trying to make which (IMO) is that the country in general lacks a proper grasp of where we are, and the consequences of continuing the status quo.
Interesting. I may think differently, so this seemed good to me. Perhaps most others don’t?
>From top to bottom, it’s my opinion that the populace is “damaged”. Whether you could reach them through honest ad-engineering or not remains to be seen. Until the current crop of appeasers and panderers is flushed from the party (or a conservative party is properly formed, which in itself seems an insurmountable challenge), the party will not be willing to perform what they see as political suicide through “negative”, “hateful” and “divisive” ads.
My hope is some will read the research on my site, and realize the damage is almost certainly not so much damage, as atrophy of the amygdala, and that research indicates that it can actually be corrected, through an aggressive derision of the Liberalism.
Thank you for the feedback. I increasingly realize we all think differently, and appreciate others giving me a window into their perceptions of my unique (odd?) angle on things.
Based on your response it seems you’re intentionally taking a scientific angle on the problem. If so, the original post makes perfect sense.