[tom h]

Hat's off to you for setting my words straight. I've been posting elsewhere on FR, especially prior to the election this month, that Romney's forecasted win of 50-48 was really no different than Reagan's, except for the complication of the 3rd party candidate in 1980. Most of the FR yahoos were critizing Romney for not being a strong enough candidate to get 55% of the vote.

[Waryone]

Well, some of us yahoos realized Romney wasn’t a strong enough candidate to begin with. We lost the election the moment people believed the lie that Romney was the only possible chance to win. If liberal is the only way to win, we’ve already lost.

For years I’ve been saying that picking a liberal like Romney was the surest way to a loss because he’s not a conservative and can’t run on or defend conservative principles. Romney proved that assessment to be 100% correct.

Reagan was proof that friends of Romney, the GOPe, RINO liberals’ belief that conservatives would never win were indeed lies and anyone falling for them should consider themselves deceived.