Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: moneyrunner

Perfect timing for this post. A Wisconsin University system English professor Bradley Butterfield just wrote an opinion piece regarding this topic in our local liberal paper.

Here is Bradley Butterfield’s opinion (mega barf alert):

Today’s conservatives have succeeded in turning a myth invented by The Heritage Foundation and President George W. Bush’s budget director, Joshua Bolten, into a commonly accepted “reality,” namely: that entitlements are the principle cause of our nation’s financial problems, and that raising taxes on the rich and cutting military spending wouldn’t even come close to solving these problems.

As Bruce Bartlett, adviser to president Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush has pointed out, this supposed reality is “factually wrong.”

In the words of economist Jeff Madrick, “America’s biggest fiscal problem is not spending on Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid; it is our almost complete unwillingness to tax ourselves sufficiently to maintain a modern state.”

Meanwhile, as Joel Slemrod and Jon Bakija write in “Taxing Ourselves,” there is no relationship between high taxes and reduced rates of economic growth. U.S. citizens are taxed at an average of 26 percent of their income, while prosperous Sweden, Norway and Denmark have tax rates of 49 percent and higher.

Given their anti-government ideology, conservatives have long had it in for entitlement programs, hence the myth of Social Security’s insolvency. But Social Security could be made solvent either by raising the payroll-tax cap, which limits withholding to incomes below $110,000, or by eliminating the cap altogether.

The same holds for our other entitlement programs, including “Obamacare.” America’s budget shortfalls are due to the Bush tax cuts and unfunded wars, not our entitlement programs. We have a revenue problem, not a spending problem.

Link:

http://lacrossetribune.com/news/opinion/bradley-butterfield-united-states-has-a-revenue-problem/article_9112fadc-2f76-11e2-8c64-0019bb2963f4.html


31 posted on 11/17/2012 5:52:50 PM PST by ThE_RiPpEr.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ThE_RiPpEr.
Here's your chance to write an reply for your paper. Tell him that you're on his side and have a few suggestions.
38 posted on 11/17/2012 6:07:35 PM PST by moneyrunner (I have not flattered its rank breath, nor bowed to its idolatries a patient knee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: ThE_RiPpEr.
Barf alert? Might I suggest a "WHAAAT?" alert?

The fellow certainly likes to name-drop, so it's no surprise that he drops the names of Sweden, Norway and Denmark (all of them constitutional monarchies, by the way.)

Note that we're not invited to look under the hood, for:

  1. The income level at which the top rate kicks in.
  2. The scope and extent of loopholes, and whether or not there's an alternative minimum tax.
  3. Everyday life there. How, er, "close-knit" are the neighbours?
No, we're supposed to buy in sight unseen. How convenient that all of those nations have official languages that hardly any American study.
41 posted on 11/17/2012 6:40:59 PM PST by danielmryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: ThE_RiPpEr.

That’s just what I want. To be like Sweden, Norway, or Denmark.

FOAD Mr. Butterfield.


54 posted on 11/18/2012 5:02:46 AM PST by sauropod (For Barack so loved the poor, he created millions more of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson