Posted on 11/16/2012 5:18:20 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Are you ready to wake up in an America where your family is defenseless against enemies foreign or domestic? This reality is right around the corner. A day after his reelection, Barack Obama signaled the United Nations that he is ready to sign an Arms Treaty to strip you of your U.S. Second Amendment Constitutional right to bear arms.
This is not new. The United Nations made earlier attempts during the administration of former President George W. Bush. But, President Bush soundly rejected the measure. Now, President Obama, fresh off of this presidential win, feels emboldened to go forward with his design to unilaterally dismember the guaranteed constitutional protections citizens of this nation are entitled to.
Do you feel comfortable with the idea that the U.S. State Department under the control of either Ambassador Hillary Clinton will truly represent your interest? What about her possible replacement nominee, America’s United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice? This is the same Ambassador Rice’s who went on five television network shows to cover up the truth of what happened to four Americans murdered on 9/11 in Benghazi, Libya.
Where does that leave Americans?
The real question is what are you prepared to do in order to defend your right to defend your family? Will you wait to see what happens? Or will you take the necessary steps to make certain that you will not have to wait and see if United Nations gun control officials knock at your door, demanding, and “Gun license and registration, please!”
The right to control your guns is not open for debate or for negotiation. It is a sovereign right that no foreign organization, including the United Nations has the right or the authority to undertake, because a president gives the go ahead....
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
No, it is an act of Treason.”
__________________________________________
And like everything else he's done, there will be absolutely no consequences. You ain't seen nothin yet!
But hey, Romney would've done the exact same thing. /sarc
Preach it, brother!
"Are you logged in?" in response to any computer help related thread.
A picture of Helen Thomas in response to any attractive female thread.
A picture of a bunny with a pancake on it's head in response to any thread that doesn't make sense.
CGEB agrees.
Just a little levity. Pardon me...
No kidding - it was funny the first time....in 1999.
What about the restrictions placed on American gun shops along the Mexican border as part of "Fast & Furious":?
Have gun shops been banned in Texas? I honestly don't know. I haven't been there in awhile. Can you buy a gun in El Paso these days or are they all closed down?
He was, however, full of bluster about what he would do if someone tried to take his guns, how his guns were untraceable, yada, yada, yada...
I am surprised some of these people can generate enough brainpower to continue breathing.
You’re not alone.
So he can kill off his opposition.
Uh
I just want to know what happened to the toy gun?
Don’t tell me
I watched it disappear into the abyss. The land is now a rice farm so it’s probably a rusted hunk of metal if it exists at all.
“tens of thousands will have to literally die because of Obama’s blatant incompetence”
we must emphasize the fact that much of Obama’s apparent malfeasance is not always due to incompetence but mostly is part of his plan to “fundamentally transform” the United States of America (and its “charter of negative liberties” otherwise known as the Constitution) from a constitutional republic to a European-style socialist superstate at best or a Marxist bureaucracy at worst.
Yes he is incompetent, but so are most Marxist imbeciles. Obama’s animating motive is to reject and supplant the vision of the United States Constitutional framers and founders and transmogrify the United States into his version of tyranny.
To call him “incompetent” is to make it look like he’s making honest mistakes.
Old Sarge, please correct me if I am mistaken, but I distinctly remember being out in the boat with you that day and my guns are with your guns on the bottom of that lake.
What army, the UN? Really now.
In light of the sex scandle for entertainment and theater for the idiots, this could be a way of discrediting the military hierarchy and replacing it with a more cooperative command that would have no problem enforcing it’s will on its own people with a UN force as a backup
>>> To call him “incompetent” is to make it look like he’s making honest mistakes.
You are correct... and I was being too “nice”.
I posted in another thread that because Marxists/Communists see wealth as a finite resource which must be distributed evenly, population control is one of the “fundamental” agenda items which they like to keep hidden.
Population control is a three-tiered or three-legged system:
1. Birth prevention (abortion/planned parenthood)
2. Attrition (control of health care system - death panels)
3. CATASTROPHIC DEATH (as needed)
And I remember you courageously diving in to save the ammo boxes, and I remember shouting, “SAVE THE RUM!!”
“Preach it, brother!”
________________________
My apologies for my choice language! Thank you for understanding.
“The constitution only requires 2/3 of the members PRESENT to ratify a treaty. Don’t need 67 senators...”
Don’t even start that scare talk up again. It will take 67 votes to pass this POS and it won’t happen. Everybody will show up for a vote like that.
“As much as I hate to admit it, Richard Lugar would support this before his Democrat successor will”
I would not be shocked.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.