Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ILS21R; Newtoidaho

And Romney still carried it 65 - 33.

- - - - -
Quite a bit of that was the Mormon factor.


36 posted on 11/13/2012 9:54:47 PM PST by reaganaut (Kyrie eleison...Christe eleison...Kyrie eleison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: reaganaut

Exactly. So why spend money where you already have it locked up?


44 posted on 11/14/2012 3:55:26 AM PST by ILS21R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut; ILS21R; Newtoidaho
Quite a bit of that was the Mormon factor.

It doesn't matter what the factor was--look at the big pic. Some states were in the bag for Romney, just as some states were in the bag for 0bama. Why would either candidate spend $$ where there was no legitimate need? That's not hinky, that's sound business decision-making.

If you want to know how R/R's money was spent, look at the swing states.

45 posted on 11/14/2012 5:32:48 AM PST by grellis (I am Jill's overwhelming sense of disgust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson