That falls well short of your claimed “right to drug use.”
Why so? Explain please.
Simple: only someone with a doctor's recommendation can get medical marijuana.
Which can be obtained for a few dollars.
So it's your contention that nobody who has ever sought a medical recommendation for marijuana has failed to obtain one? Can you provide any reason for anyone to believe this?
Red herring - nobody here has said one should act contrary to court rulings.
No scarlet fish here...the point is quite simple...I have to live with laws I don't approve of.
That point is irrelevant to any matter under discussion - and thus is a red herring. Understand?
I decided it was relevant to the discussion
Your decision was erroneous - nobody here has said one should act contrary to court rulings.
Do you have anything further to add to the discussion?
Since I've refuted every argument you've clearly stated, and exposed your steadfast coyness about those you haven't, I suspect not.
the fact that alcohol is often used to impair judgment and ability leaves you with a very thin reed on which to hang your claimed distinction from other drugs - particularly when one notes that impairment was the whole purpose of alcohol use when that mind-altering drug was illegal.
Not so, not so. Wine at meals and celebrations has been a tradition long before there was a U.S. or Prohibition.
Getting drunk dates back as far - your reed remains thin.
Did you think those people suddenly headed to a speakeasy to get drunk just because of Prohibition?
No, I know they were acting on the age-old tradition of getting drunk - your reed remains thin.
“Your decision was erroneous...”
I see.
“Since I’ve refuted every argument you’ve clearly stated, and exposed your steadfast coyness about those you haven’t, I suspect not.”
Don’t put yourself down, you’ve made all the standard arguments in favor of sodomy, etc., privacy, as well as having a drug sodden society destroy its self under the guise of freedom and liberty.
I suspect not too.