If this is even remotely true, it is the LEAST of what petraeus has to answer for. The VERY least.
LLS
But then the Commander in Chief did not resign. But that’s ok of course because he explained that he did not touch her, she touched him!
Her it is straight from CNN.
I think we are going bed bug nuts!
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/08/17/time/clinton.html
But then the Commander in Chief did not resign. But that’s ok of course because he explained that he did not touch her, she touched him!
Her it is straight from CNN.
I think we are going bed bug nuts!
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/08/17/time/clinton.html
That story by itself doesn’t make sense. If they were blackmailing him, threatening to reveal the affair if he didn’t resign, then why would he resign, and reveal the affair himself, and not testify on top of that? As soon as he revealed the affair, the power of their blackmail vanished, and he would have no reason not to testify.
So, I think they must have some other blackmail on him, and the affair story is just his cover for why he is resigning.