Posted on 11/08/2012 12:19:42 AM PST by Mr170IQ
The clues:
Looking at the results from the election, it seems very suspicious that there was so little Republican turnout, even though anecdotal evidence shows that both enthusiasm and turnout was much higher this time.
The Theory:
I believe that the democrats managed to electronically drop a percentage (maybe 20%) of the votes in the republican majority precincts of the swing states. In order not to be too obvious, they dropped democrat votes as well as republican votes. This enabled them to get those absurd D+8 and D+13 numbers that the pre-election polls were using.
Proving it:
In order to prove this we would have to pick several republican precincts in swing states that showed oddly poor turnout.
Then we need to obtain the official list of everyone who voted in those precincts in this election, as well as the complete list of registered voters in that precinct. Then we would have to contact every registered voter and ask them, if they voted in the election, and if so, when and where (but not for whom).
If there is a highly-significant number of registered voters who claim to have voted, but are recorded as NOT voting, then we need to get legal affidavits from all of them, affirming that they voted, as well as where and when.
If possible, also find witnesses who observed them voting and get affidavits from them as well.
Fixing it:
From the states where we have proven that votes were being thrown out, we would need to get a judge to block the state from officially certifying the electors, or we need enough congressmen on our side to block accepting the electoral votes from those states.
Without 270 electors voting for Obama/Biden, the election for President is thrown to the House of Representatives , and the election for Vice-President is thrown to the Senate. We end up with Romney/Biden - which is a hell of a lot better than Obama/Biden for another four years.
Then quit and become a democrat.
No, they didn’t and they made sure to take conservatives down too before they left.
Now they are trying to blame the same conservatives they backstabbed.
The first thing to do is to get rid of those damned voting machines as they were flipping a lot of Romney votes for Obama this time round. Next make it mandatory that voters show some form of identification. Next make sure that those who count the votes are not political party operatives as has been the case in some instances this time round.
I wondered that too.. Graciousness is met with punishment when the opposition is EVIL. God is shaping the endgame and I don’t think it ends well. Shifting eyes to Israel now because I think Netanyahu will be sending Achmed some ‘flowers’, hopefully daisy cutters. Israel surely won’t be able to count on the ‘betrayer of SEALs for the sake of Islam’ to help them out.
He didn’t sweep them. Mitt won North Carolina.
Let’s not forget the military plane that crashed a week or two ago and lost all those ballots.
With more than 50 Rat senators, there is 0% chance that the senate would vote for removal of a Rat president, even if he was videotaped launching a nuclear missile at the national Girl Scout Jamboree.
We’ll never know how it was stolen. And now that the Dems HAVE successfully stolen an election, they dare not allow themselves to lose again: they’d be found out and prosecuted.
We’ve seen how the Obama administration handles fraud. . . it ignores it.
We’re stuck riding this one down to the inevitable crash. . . and its’ aftermath. And then re-build after. Just remember: to the Dems and their Eater subjects. . . Nothing. No pity, no mercy, and ESPECIALLY no charity. They made the bed for all of us. . . they have to sleep in it now. . .
They bought the Mitt hates Women lie hook, line and sinker.
The Bizarro World really exists, trust me.
He could be impeached, but a Rat senate would NEVER have 67 votes to remove a Rat president. No point in trying.
Better to block the results of this election through the House of Reps, since the constitution gives the power to them.
“Well never know how it was stolen.”
Easy. Mitt didn’t deliver the goods. Simple as that - no conspiracy.
“They bought the Mitt hates Women lie hook, line and sinker.”
They know how to manipulate emotions. They have it down to a science. There was a thread that was pulled that explained the kind of data crunching they used to pick the best ads on the best channels at the right time for the group they want to target.
My point above is that IF the Rats stole it the way I think they did, it IS possible to prove it by using a LOT of legwork to show that there is a massive pattern of missing votes from Republican precincts in swing states.
Note, these missing votes would also have affected the Senate races in these swing states.
All those suspicious I.T. problems on election day....no coincidence. Those are hackable...as they say, vote all you like but who counts them is the winner.
Add votes, that could happen with those reported machines that when screen punched for Romney, they went to Obama. Some reported retrying as much as 3 times until it stayed on Romney.
Internally we don't know what those machines recorded. 3 Votes for Obama, 1 for Romney.
I think something was in play with those machines for sure, because remember when it was reported that Tagg Romney has some vested interest in the voting machines?
That was, IMO, put forth by the Democrats to place blame on the Romneys, in case it were ever discovered that they had actually commited FRAUD themselves.
Democrats are just more devious than we can ever imagine, they know how to play the games with lies and deception better than anyone. Get caught, blame others.
Elections have became a joke people no one cares what the voter thinks.
As someone said, if voting really mattered they wouldnt let us do it.
And you’re welcome to keep your head in the sand.
Unless the system is repaired, the results won’t change.
Where we vote we had to wait an hour in line. There was a line ALL DAY. We have lived here 20 years and vote EVERY TIME (primaries and all). I have NEVER, REPEAT NEVER had to wait in line. Yet we had LESS votes than in 2008. Curious, to say the least. No, the fix was in. Perhaps this explains Zero’s behavior, ESP. The first debate. He really did believe all he had to do was show up.
And guess what. . . Allen, who was 2-3 points ahead in Virginia, lost to Kaine by 5%. Romney, who was ahead of Obama by ~5%, lost by 3%.
8 points on both. Coincidence ??
Too early and to tired to research it, but to the best of my understanding, one can go to their Voter Registration Account online to verify that their vote was accepted and counted.
If there was a “sample” group of say 1000 in these swing states that have that feature, it seems to me that it would be easy to see if that type of toss out fraud was committed. If say 5-10% showed up as not voted, or voted for a different candidate than they actually marked, then I think it would be worth the time and money to investigate further. If the sample showed potential fraud, the State would have a duty to hold off on giving the EV to a specific candidate until a broader investigation could be undertaken. WA is one of the states that I think you can check your (after) voting status, (not that WA is a swing state, although it would surprise me if Eastern WA was as BLUE as the “powers that be” claim). Might be worth looking into I would think.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.