You are all a broken record. Nobody would have beat Obama. the press was set to seek and destroy. Romney was a great candidate and totally qualified to leas this country out of the wilderness.
>Romney was a great candidate and totally qualified to leas this country out of the wilderness.<
Just like Joseph Smith?
So now Jimmy Carter 2 has morphed into Reagan of 1984, as ‘unbeatable’ by anyone?
Romney was a disaster, and he has been a loser his entire 20 years of running for office.
In 2008 he spent 150 million dollars to get beaten by two guys with no money, called McCain and Huckabee, and in 2012, Mitt got stomped by Jimmy Carter.
Nobody would have beat Obama.
***Let’s look at the Vote totals:
2008:
OBama 69,297,997
McCain: 59,597,520
2012:
Obama: 54,773,837
Romney 53,716,689
Looks like a whole lot of voters stayed home.
Obama -15M
Romney -6M
So, Romney got 6M votes LESS than McLame did, in a poor economy. Are you saying McLame was a better candidate? Palin was the one who propped up McLame. If she were the candidate she wouldn’t have had a gender gap & would have sent the bass turd packing.
Romney was vague and had at least two positions on every issue.
I also think he ran a good race and worked hard. I don’t think we are going to be able to win the top spot because the integrity of the process has been polluted by the other side.
This civil war has been going on for a long time. Reagan managed to win it because he was a guy who lost the first time and put together a machine to run the second time and win. Romney put together a machine too, but we have different voting techniques now. The prep has to begin long before a primary season.
If conservatives want to win, we are going to have to put better type candidates on tickets than Akin’s and Mourdocks. In the primaries, none of the presidential candidates besides Romney had an ounce of the needed backing and preparation to even try to win.