If the above could be true, then why was a forged birth cert necessary?
And not a shred of any kind of evidence at all, that SAD was in HI during that time?
I mean, none, as in none.
Various possible reasons.
1. The source original may have the ‘not stated’ for the father fields.
2. The on record one may have ‘amended’ stamped all over it.
3. It mayve been sealed due to the name change and adoption/guardianship process. Remember the claim that the Gov of Hawaii (Lingle) ‘sealed’ the record. Last time I checked Governors do not order records legally sealed - judges do. So the original may very well be officially sealed - but probably not by Gov. Lingle.
4. Many other reasons.
Even if Obama is father and SAD is mother the BC probably was spun and mutilated at various junctions.
1961.
1964. Divorce that is the first known legal AND verifiable reference to Obama II.
1965/1966. Possible adoption by Lolo.
1971. What ever happened there that required the legal birth father to make an extended stay in Hawaii during the Grand Reunion.
1980. Lolo / SAD divorce.
All or any of these and maybe other times were times when the documents would altered, amended, sealed, unsealed, etc.