Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: bluecat6

We are mostly in agreement.

IMO there is a verifiable legal certainty that Stanley Ann was living in Seattle attending U of WA. because it is contemporaneously corroborated by MULTIPLE verifiable state and federal records at INS, HI and WA. One unusual spelling of Ann as Anna in the Seattle Polk that is totally uncorroborated will mean nothing in any forensic investigation or federal court. The spelling could be a simple typo by the Polk clerk or an alternate name temporarily chosen by a 19-year-old who at that age frequently experiment with different names.

If you check, every “Filipina” reference is uncorroborated contemporaneously AND highly speculative in every way. The McKeon memo from Baltimore INS in 1964 says “separated” wife IN the Philippines, not Filipina, as previously discussed and is years removed in time and geography from the insemination event in 1960. Being uncorroborated, the McKeon reference could easily have been misdirection by Sr. or misremembered by McKeon between his interview and his write-up of the mamo.

The ONLY separated wife in 1964 in the US in INS records (prior to divorce finalization) was Stanley Ann Dunham Obama. If there was another one, such as an alternate Anna Obama with a half-Filipino baby, wouldn’t McKeon have noted that in some way?

The Nachmanoff woman was named as Japanese by the Cambodian classmate, IIRC and the women on the dock (conclusively ID’d as a departure) may LOOK Filipina to some but could just as easily be Japanese or HI mixed race to my eye, but in 1962 when Sr. would have departed, what can be concluded from two alleged Filipina women standing next to notorious skirt-chaser BHO Sr.? That he was married to one of them who had a 100% African-looking baby who grew up to be Roman Obama three years earlier...(not that you are still saying this)?


295 posted on 12/19/2012 11:48:55 AM PST by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies ]


To: Seizethecarp

Woman in front is Filipino heritage. Specific facial features are clear to say that. Definitely not Japanese heritage.

One in back looks she may be the Nachmanoffs picture. Hair is similar. Harder to say ‘definitely’. I still lean toward Filipino on Dock and Nachmanoff picture is inconclusive. Bad angle and low quality.

Dock photo seems mechanically suspect (i.e. possible photoshop). I know that if is authentic it is departure not arrival. Seems like a lot of leis on Senior. Maybe that is appropriate given his nature!


298 posted on 12/19/2012 12:35:46 PM PST by bluecat6 ("All non-denial denials. They doubt our ancestry, but they don't say the story isn't accurate. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson