...BTW, I note that at U of WA in Spring 1962, she studied Chinese Civilization, yet another Asian culture. Are you beginning to get the idea yet, that if anyone whose surname was OBAMA studied ANYTHING at the U of WA - it was more likely to have been the woman listed in the Polk, whose name appears on an abstract of a transcript as OBAMA Stanley Ann Dunham.
All that was needed was the addition of Stanley and Dunham to the name, and there you have the student OBAMA ANN turned into someone else. Now add a graduation from Mercer Island High School, and there's your record.
IT'S AN 'ABSTRACT', like the birth certificate, which shows one layer as mother's name ANN D...which in another layer becomes Stanley Ann Dunham after the addition of (Stanley) and the addition of UNHAM and OBAMA to make DUNHAM OBAMA.
For a certified document examiner, you sure haven't done a lot of examining. Mind you, it's difficult, nothing we have seen exists other than in cyber-space...
IT WOULD SEEM THE MAIDEN NAME OF THE MOTHER OF THE CHILD BORN IN JANUARY WAS ANN D (SOMETHING) - Nice one, because that tells us the original birth certificate was in the possession of 'someone' when the abstract was created. The signature of the mother, ANN D gives that away, doesn't it?
I am a retired certified fraud examiner (CFE and also CPA) NOT certified document examiner.
No certified document examiner would touch authentication of the WH LFBC because the original is not available, for starters and beyond that the digital imaging experts have concluded it is 100% manufactured from bits that cannot be reliably sourced.
No element of the WH LFBC can be relied on in any way, IMO.
The way that Stanley Ann Dunham Obama’s name was constructed piece by piece has no evidentiary value.
No part of the WH LFBC would survive cross-examination under the Federal Rules of Evidence which is why it has never been allowed to be placed into evidence in any trial on the merits with full discovery.
In contrast to the aggressively withheld WH LFBC original in HI, the U of WA transcript could easily be subpoenaed and challenged in federal court, so it readily verifiable. It is corroborated by the publicly available U of HI transcript that an also be subpoenaed. There isn't the slightest serious suspicion that these two university transcripts are not genuine. Only Mal-Val conspiracy theorists invested a priori in Stanley Ann never being in WA or even ever meeting BHO Sr. in HI have intimated there is a problem with these transcripts.