I cannot disagree with anything you’ve said. The woman on the “couch” (which is, as you noted, obviously manufactured with crude photoshop) does not resemble the woman holding the small baby.
The photo from the passport application resembles the photo of her in the sailor type dress at a port. The very arched eyebrows, IIRC are not a comment feature in SAD. I wonder if there are times when they looked more like that, might be able to determine timeframe from them.
And the boy does look older in the “couch” photo, than in the photo with the older baby Maya.
They must have been at their wits’ end trying to create a family image with very little material.
And funny how even in Indonesia someone managed to at least take a few photos of baby Maya, mother SAD and even grandmother Madelyn, but in HI not one single photo of SAD and a baby Zero...
Another intersting factoid is that the Gilbertson film and FMD myth seems to have dissolved like mist in the rising morning sun.
One thing that might be wrong with the entire presentation is that it's possible they have used an image of SAD from an earlier time, before she was pregnant with Maya, and was still slim enough to wear a short tight dress as shown in the couch image.
Alternatively, what you see is her face only, and the body doesn't belong to her. When you compare Stanley Ann Dunham holding what appears to be a newborn, with the couch image, she appears to have returned to a slim youthful figure in a very short time. I'm more inclined to believe it's her face and not her body in that black dress.
And although Jerome Corsi gave space on WND to the story of the Joel Gilbert DVD, I was pleased to see Corsi comment that he personally didn't go along with the FMD-FATHER-THEORY, which hung on the identification of an (unidentified) Model whose images appeared in exotic magazines in 1958, as being Stanley Ann Dunham who would have been only sixteen and still in high school somewhere at the time. The entire scenario was grotesque.