Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Fred Nerks

Had not see the first image here.

So that photo was taken in Muslim-dominated Indonesia in the 1970s, eh?

It supposed to be of a mother of 2 who is at least 29 and maybe 30 or 31 years old?

Well, she must have hit the treadmill right after having Maya. Because her legs look pretty good and she sure is showing them off for a ‘family’ photo in a Muslim society.

The kid has the expected bio markers for Obama. Its probably him. SAD has the usual sterile look that all her images have. I sometimes wonder if she is real at all given the imagery.

But is this an image of a 30 year old mother who just had her 2nd child in the last year posing in Indonesia in 1971 with a tight fitting dress short enough to make a Playboy bunny blush?

Notice the EXIF data on this one? Interesting.


185 posted on 12/15/2012 6:26:25 AM PST by bluecat6 ("All non-denial denials. They doubt our ancestry, but they don't say the story isn't accurate. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]


To: bluecat6

I think the sequence I posted should clearly show the group on the couch is a composite created from a number of photographs. The couch appears to be the result of the ends of two chairs in which two people were sitting, the people are who we are meant to know them to be; there’s no doubt zero is zero...but if all the inviduals were originally photographed in the 1970’s is hard to tell. If that’s baby Maya then yes, she was photographed a short time after she was born, but who-ever created the composition obviously didn’t have a photograph of SAD holding Maya that was suitable to use...so they PLANTED her in her lap, but in a different position in both, though the baby is in EXACTLY THE SAME POSE in both.
A freeper provided the first image from a photobucket account quite some time ago. I do not know its origin. I don’t know how to obtain EXIF DATA, would you be so kind as to send it to me PRIVATE MAIL? PLEASE.


186 posted on 12/15/2012 12:32:30 PM PST by Fred Nerks (fair Dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]

To: bluecat6

An image from her 1972 passport application beside the image from the sequence. It's hard to tell, it seems that much of her hair in the sequence is painted on. And when you draw attention to her short skirt, I guess it might be an idea to remember - you could be looking at her head and the body came from elsewhere. There's no guarantee it's her...neither can you know for certain if the original photographs were taken in Indonesia.

187 posted on 12/15/2012 12:50:56 PM PST by Fred Nerks (fair Dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]

To: bluecat6; PhilDragoo

Thanks, Phil. I think the only explanation is that the baby is actually a plastic doll, it never moves it's head or changes expression, regardless where you place it. sarc.

188 posted on 12/15/2012 2:00:15 PM PST by Fred Nerks (fair Dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson