Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Little Ray
"What conceivable naval threat requires the USN to have 11 CVNs, 22 Ticonderoga class CGs, 61 Arleigh Burke class DDGs (cruisers by any other name), 19 OHP FFGs, 55 SSNs, 4 SSGNs, ~400 F/A-18A/B/C/D, ~500 F/A-18E/Fs, and ~100 EA-18Gs? Are we planning on fighting all the navies of the world? At the same time?"

No, we're not. But better to have such resources than not. BTW, where did you get your numbers? Also, at any given time, many of those ships are in overhaul or in stand down from deployments.

"I know there is a need to build new ships as the current ones age and wear out, and to upgrade technology, but, for the foreseeable future, we have no rivals on the ocean. We cannot constantly maintain a navy capable of fighting the entire world. Also, we can’t really afford $3.45 billion dollar “destroyers” (in comparison, the current class of CVN costs $9 billion per unit; new Arleigh Burkes cost ~$1.85 billion). In order to get the fiscal house in order, EVERYBODY has to take a hit. That includes the military. We cannot constantly maintain a navy capable of fighting the entire world."

Our fedgov now runs trillion dollar deficits every year and you're concerned about a few billion here and there for additional ships? However, I will say I don't really see the need for frigates or basic cruisers anymore. I'd prefer to see more Aegis equipped cruisers built. But then I wasn't and admiral, so maybe frigates/destroyers have some worth.

If there is one job of the Fedgov, it is to protect the United States. China is building up its fleet exponentially; Russia is rebuilding its offences; North Korea and Iran are building nuclear arsenals; missle systems are proliferating throughout the world; not to mention US need for power projection.

Don't know how old you are, but if young, there will come a time you will want enough ships to deploy aircraft, troops, and Aegis missle systems into a given hot spot. The nuclear world is expanding. ICBM's and bombers are old news. Navy ships (including subs) are becoming our best strategic defense. I say the more the better. Diplomacy through strength has always worked.

Cut the trillion dollar social programs (including fedgov employees) and protect our Nation. And contrary to apologist Obama, there are still lots of bad guys out there who would like to see the US go away, and they are growing in the Islamist community. The seas are the lifeblood of commerce and freedom. The more US ships out there, the happier I am. And give me more aircraft and missle delivery systems while you're at it.

14 posted on 10/31/2012 7:42:57 AM PDT by A Navy Vet (An Oath is Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: A Navy Vet
The simple fact is that, as things are going, the USA cannot continue to exist, Navy or no Navy. Either we cut, EVERYWHERE, or we go bankrupt. And the bankruptcy of the USA will be the most catastrophic event the world has ever see in its recorded history, dwarfing wars, plagues, volcanic eruptions, etc.

I would like nothing better than to cut welfare, “social programs” and federal headcount. But I haven't seen any candidates to vote for in this respect. Have you?

15 posted on 10/31/2012 9:04:31 AM PDT by Little Ray (I have VOTED AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson