How could anyone in his right mind compare the navy to horses and bayonets? Oh, I guess I just answered my own question, Obama isn't in his right mind. You can bet the liberal media won't criticize Obama for his comments about aircraft carriers and submarines the way they criticized Sarah Palin. I was surprised Fox didn't jump on that comment, or maybe I turned it off too soon.
1 posted on
10/23/2012 12:29:01 PM PDT by
kathsua
To: kathsua
...over the next two weeks Odungo is going to be undressed not because of who he is, but because of what he say's, his own undoing, desperation....
2 posted on
10/23/2012 12:32:56 PM PDT by
Doogle
((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: kathsua
3 posted on
10/23/2012 12:35:05 PM PDT by
dead
(It ain't over until the phone lady sings.)
To: kathsua
Four years ago Democrats criticized Gov. Sarah Palin for her statement "I can see Russia from my house".<facepalm>
Sarah Palin said, of Alaska: "You can see Russia from here."
Which is exactly correct:
4 posted on
10/23/2012 12:36:10 PM PDT by
Yossarian
("All the charm of Nixon. All the competency of Carter." - SF Chronicle comment post on Obama)
To: kathsua
A submarine is classified as a boat, not a ship.
5 posted on
10/23/2012 12:36:56 PM PDT by
Mustard
To: kathsua
When the LJW starts bashing Obama, he doesn’t have a chance. Who’s next—The KC Red Star?
6 posted on
10/23/2012 12:36:56 PM PDT by
KansasGirl
("If you have a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."--B. Hussein Obama)
To: kathsua
Zero tried to condescend to Mitt but ended making himself look petty and vindictive... like the rest of liberal-dom.
7 posted on
10/23/2012 12:39:54 PM PDT by
ez
(When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail.)
To: kathsua
I agree. I thought that was a non sequitur when Obama said it. No matter how sophisticated the ship, it can only be in one place at a time, and the oceans are big places. Granted carriers have considerable range, but I doubt it stretches from the Persion Gulf to Taiwan. What's the old axiom, whoever is “firstest with the mostest” wins. Hence Benghazi on the micro scale. I wonder what Patraeus is thinking about his new job now BTW?
8 posted on
10/23/2012 12:40:23 PM PDT by
throwback
(The object of opening the mind, is as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid.)
To: kathsua
There is only one way to control a place. You have to have a PHYSICAL PRESENCE. Planes and drones and subs are great for preparing for occupation, but without ships and boots/tanks on the ground you are not holding a place.
This is a military Commander-in-Chief?
10 posted on
10/23/2012 1:14:31 PM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics.)
To: kathsua
Flop sweat is never pretty.
12 posted on
10/23/2012 1:19:26 PM PDT by
linn37
(Newt supporter here.)
To: kathsua
Four years ago Democrats criticized Gov. Sarah Palin for her statement "I can see Russia from my house".
Reasonmcluus, wrote a decent article, and I appreciate all of it, except the above, about which reasonmcluus doesn't have a clue.
Sarah Palin NEVER said "I can see Russia from my house."
That was Tina Fey and it was a skit written for Saturday Night Live. It took on a life of its own, but those words NEVER were uttered by Sarah Palin.
Sarah did say that Alaska engaged in commerce with Russia and shared the Bering Sea with them and frequently dealt with shipping, fishing, and other issues. She also said that from one island that was part of Alaska observers could actually see Russia in the right conditions. Which is true.
See Snopes: http://www.snopes.com/politics/palin/seealaska.asp
14 posted on
10/23/2012 2:16:57 PM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
To: kathsua
The president seems to indicate that high tech has made it possible for the Navy to be smaller. In reality, being able to target a square meter of the earth with a cruise missile fired from thousands of miles away makes it necessary to have more ships that are uniquely stealthy and probably smaller than the huge carriers of old.
I’m sure someone, someplace is devising a submersible, aircraft launching naval vessel....if they don’t already have one.
15 posted on
10/23/2012 2:20:07 PM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson