I hate to say this but there are senators and congress critters on our side that already know what happened because they were briefed. It may not have been a factual briefing by the WH..but lots of them have ways of finding out stuff. Why haven’t they leaked? That really bothers me a lot. Washington should be leaking like a sieve by now, but very little is getting out. My guess is that Obama and his minions have wrapped it in a nice little package called ‘national security’ , so that it shuts everyone up. They can’t talk with the penalty of disclosing national security secrets hanging over their heads. I am afraid that AQ and other MB groups have gotten hold of Libya and Syria’s chemical weapon WMDS and our government is freaking out.
‘the Taliban is in the building’ and Panetta doesn’t know where the chemical weapons are......remember he announced that just days before this attack or was it a few days after? I know it was recently.
Hmmm...
HUNT: No, no, no. State and the White House. The National Military Command Center would not have been able, allowed, to launch---I don't believe---an attack without political permission because they would be launching into a country. I don't think the NMCC could make that call on their own. And it wouldn't be State; it would be the White House.
But again, Howie, during this attack, Clinton is informed---that is part of the procedure---and the President of the US is informed, as is the Vice President, as is the Chief of Staff, and on and on. A six hour firefight in Benghazi is not classified. It is not a secret. It's an event, and it's a serious event. And when the ambassador dies, when they know he has been captured, it even goes up higher. And we couldn't get an FBI team in there for three weeks.
We had CNN reporters in there picking up the Ambassador's diary. This was ineptness, incompetence, and lying. I think Biden ought to be called on it, just like we did with Clinton when she said she was being shot at. People were there Mr. Vice President. You are lying. This was not an intelligence failure, and he knows that.
Panetta doesn’t know where the chemical weapons are......remember he announced that just days before this attack or was it a few days after? I know it was recently.
_____________________________\
He announced about Syrian chemical weapons after the attack.
There are scads of stories and videos (even more if you don’t go strictly English version)about Gaddafi’s weapons found unsecured when our gov’t was assuring everyone they had been secured. Yellow cake, missiles, chemical—LOTS and LOTS. Some of the finds were being raided before they could get officials there to take/secure it. Missiles carried across borders and some even buried along borders. Add to that many of Gaddafi’s nuclear and chemical scientist that were lost, too. It was a HUGE freakin’ mess on the weapons front and in part because Obama listened to the UN, no boots on the ground. Denmark wasn’t too happy about America taking a backseat, either:
Denmark Criticises Last Year’s NATO’s Libya Mission
13/10/2012 13:25:00
NATO’s lack of military intelligence hampered Denmark’s bombing campaign in Libya in 2011, according to a confidential report.
According to the report obtained by Politiken newspaper through a freedom of information request, the Danish Air Force had insufficient intelligence to guide its bombing campaign in Libya last year under NATO leadership.
The problems arose after the Air Force was moved from American to NATO leadership on March 31 last year. Before the switchover, Denmark’s missions were guided by the US, which had superior military intelligence.
http://www.tripolipost.com/articledetail.asp?c=1&i=9302