Wonder who their candidate would be?
Posted on 10/18/2012 5:59:46 AM PDT by FiddlePig
She seemed to have the transcript as if on queue… if not, a strange “coincidence” indeed!??? Obama saved by the girl?
After checking into the transcript between Axelord and Can-D, I have a question about the timeline. The interview took place on September 28 (I believe), and was aired on September 30. Now granted, I DO believe Axelrod was setting this up, but that was over two and a half weeks earlier, not just a couple of days. The fact that she had THAT transcript vs. all the other ones says she wanted to believe Axelrod’s excuse (essentially a lie) even though she had to know that is NOT what obama’s words implied.
The fact that she knew Axelrod’s line of reasoning before the debate and still THEN jumped in at a crtical point where Romney had obama beaten on the Benghazi question.....says Can-D was NOT impartial.
Wonder who their candidate would be?
I don't know that he did. He might be saying this in the sense of "Go ahead -- get the transcript and look at it." It may not have been in the sense you are taking it of "look on your table at the document that you and I discussed before the debate."
Very revealing! This is the local CBS station, not conservative media, in San Francisco. Not one comment (so far) has been in favor of 0. Every single one comments on the lies, the train wreck of this administration, the fact that there is a backstory we don’t know about Benghazi, and the corruption and collusion of the media. If this is happening in SF - of all places - there is hope for a huge blowout!
I'm not claiming that she is impartial. I am saying that she bought into this WH spin and was regurgitating it during the debate. That is a different statement than claiming that Obama and Candy set this up beforehand.
To all the doubters on this thread, who think maybe the whole thing was not plotted ahead of time:
What was the issue that was hottest at the time of the debate? Libya. And what were people most concerned about? That the president was passing this off as our fault, that because someone here in American had made a video, this caused the whole incident by creating a kind of blowback against the terrible Islamophobic Americans.
Even if they hadn’t gathered as much from the news, internal polling could have told them the same thing.
So they zeroed in on it.
They first thought of eliminating Libya from the debate. Then when that got out, they changed the plan to create a false scenario, against the clear vision of most Americans.
Just connect the dots.
And now I hear rumors that there is a “story” being circulated that there was ANOTHER press conference, the same day, not in the Rose Garden, in which the president had call the Libya murders “terrorism.” OK, it’s a rumor. Don’t put it past them. Has anyone heard the faintest clue that there was a second press conference before this?
And always remember that turning American into a communist country is such an important goal that any depth of depravity is worth it.
I don’t think so. I think the whole thing was scripted, including having the First Liar lead the applause. We’re not mindreaders. We’re trying to figure out what happened behind the scenes of a very suspicious situation.
“They were in effect applauding the idea that the president knew it was a pre-planned terror attack on day one and had been lying to the world the whole time.’
Romney’s next question should have been, “if you knew this was an act of terror for 14 days and your administration lied, why wasn’t Hillary Clinton fired?”
I wondered if BO saw the staff handing Kerry the microphone, which might have been how he identified who would be speaking next. But in these debates there are often numerous microphones being handed around as the staff lines up the questioners. The producers simply turn on the microphone for the next questioner.
I’m not sure this is a “smoking gun.”
Two more points, and then I am going out for a walk:
The person who told me about the supposed second press conference on the same day as the Rose Garden one tells me she heard it on conservative talk radio in the morning, and it was about a statement issue by the White House. I did try to find it on google.news but didn’t see it.
Think about why Obama would do the entire terrorism-denial thing: He is in full campaign mode and terrorism on his watch, especially involving inadequate security at our embassy, would hurt him politically. So what does the Alinsky rule book say to do? Accuse your opponent of what you are doing. So Obama accused Romney of making political hay out of the terrorism.
Maybe this second point is obvious but it’s all part of the mix.
Those comments read like a Free Republic thread!
CBS San Fransisco and you get those comments...just wow!
The Dems were desperate for Obama not to look like an idiot again and this bunch from Chicago will do ANYTHING to win an election.
Ironically, I think the after-effect will be exactly the opposite of what they were trying to create. Everybody is again reviewing what he said in the Rose Garden on Sept. 12 and all the mentions afterward of how that stupid, unknown video was to blame, not only by Obama but Susan Rice, Hillary, Jay Carney, et al.
And I think more and more people are questioning what happened at the debate and how it's just a little too much of a coincidence.
It may not have been in the sense you are taking it of “look on your table at the document that you and I discussed before the debate.”
She didn’t have a pile of docs in front of her. Funny, she just happened to have the pertinent one. THERE ARE NO COINCIDENCES!
Like it was part of a prearranged script with Crowley.
interesting, (F & F and embassy attack) two issues where Americans died followed by a cover-up and lies from multiple departments in Obama administration.
They do not want it discussed or displayed with massive audience. Try to rewrite history, spin and minimize. Hope Romney brings up both in the next debate, corrects the spin...regardless of what the moderator says.
Crowley: Obama Took 17 Days to Claim Benghazi Was Terror Attack
Crowley to Axelrod: Obama Never Said Benghazi Attack Was 'Act of Terror'
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.