It wouldn’t have mattered WHAT Romney had said; the Democrats had to seize on anything they could warp and twist to give Obama something, anything to exaggerate.
47% of voters ARE likely to vote for their Messiah because he throws them a few crumbs after he and Michelle eat the cake.
If it hadn’t been that, it woulda been something else. - Obama needs to EXPLAIN - Benghazi. Hillary needs to explain - Benghazi.
I agree with you. But it was clear that in listening to Rush today that there was a kernel of something he was looking for and I wanted to think that this was it. I think being able to parry attacks is key in any campaign and in any debate. To leave an attack unanswered is in many ways a backdoor concession as to its truth. Let’s have a discussion as to just which candidate is IN FACT the more inclusive!
Not true. Of that 47% most are people who just do not earn enough money not welfare recipients.
See my comment above.