Posted on 10/13/2012 6:30:02 PM PDT by bannie
The Clintons are clearly on a divergent path than President Obama. Hillary just Judod Obama in this informative article posted in the UK Daily Mail. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2215431/Death-U-S-ambassador-Chris-Stevens-revealed-AK-47s-grenade-attacks-smoke-filled-safe-room.html?ITO=1490
I love the smell of infighting in the evening!
...and we have to read it in a UK newspaper................
You KNOW that she and bubba have been scripting their backstory over the last couple of days. I expect to hear a bushel of “I don’t recall” claims.
It's a little late for that isn't it, since Hillary mentioned the film in just about every speech or comment that came out of her mouth, not to mention the apology she taped with Obama to air in muzzie countries.
Why do you think all personel were pulled out of Libya?
Classified documents that contains names of covert ops were lost.
There could be other lives lost, because of these classified documents being left behind.
This big push for early voting by BO is starting to make sense.....
Maybe I am missing something, but I frankly don’t see anything here that has come directly from Clinton’s mouth. I guess if and when she testifies, big IF, then she will have to either serve her president or save herself.
Hillary is claiming that she had nothing to do with Rice’s behavior on this...that Rice got all of this FROM THE WHITE HOUSE. ;)
We KNOW that hillary doesn’t EVER “take it.” She “gives it”!
That Daily Mail article is deadly to the Obama campaign...lethal.
Hillary will not go down without taking the big dog with her.
OK you are right. She only knows lies. However, put her under oath anyway
and destroy her for 2016.
Hillary is pointing that finger solely at the White House.
Gonna’ get good around here.
If things were truly going well for Obama, Hillary would be as pleased as punch to be riding his coattails into a second term. But, the blame game has begun so things must be going badly.
I wonder how long it will take before the lamestream media begins to pile on?
Why can we see it and they can't?
“The State Department’s insistence it never bought the story - expressed by the White House and Susan Rice, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations - that a crude anti-Islam film made in California triggered the attack gives ammunition against Obama both to the Romney campaign and congressional Republicans.”
This leads me to believe it’s Hillary’s voice...?
Bingo! You KNOW that SHE WILL NOT! The Clinton Machine is now in high gear. Heck, the Clinton’s may even fall back in love again with all of this excitement!
Scaled back because the attack was planned - thugs were supposed to kidnap the ambassador so that Zero could then get him “rescued”. Other thugs took over and killed him.
That does not explain why Hillary was blaming the video as well.
She and Obama are thick as thieves. So why was she spouting the same lies?
It’s obvious to those who choose to see.
I would ask the question “ which dept and what official paid for the ad’s that ran apologizing for the video.” CIA, Whitehouse or State dept. I am popping my corn awaiting the answer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.