[moneyrunner]

I felt a little bit put off by the insinuation that I have a shallow apprehension of the issues and the parties for which I must compensate by watching the debates.

I did not mean to imply that people who watch these debates are all shallow and I did not imply that the 60 million who watched it were wrong to do so. I’m very glad that it got a huge audience. I was trying to make two points: the first one is a personal one; I find that watching these presentations “live” is painful to me so I don’t do it. Second, I am not among the “undecided” that will be swayed by a superior debate performance. From your response that is also true of you.

My main point is that the Barack Obama and the Mitt Romney people saw in the debate are the real deal. This is as good as either one is going to get (remember the Jack Nicholson movie). The Obama you saw is the one making economic decisions and foreign policy decisions. If that doesn’t scare the heck out of you I don’t know what does.

[Nervous Tick]

>> I did not mean to imply that people who watch these debates are all shallow and I did not imply that the 60 million who watched it were wrong to do so.

Then you should learn to watch your arrogant mouth, because that’s certainly the way it came off.

Hope you don’t mind if I post that on YOUR thread, “sir”. I see you’re thin-skinned and I wouldn’t want to upset you.