Stating the obvious is hardly racist, and as a glance at images of the inhabitants of Mexico will show, a statement of considerable predictive capability.
Culture counts, and Mexico is “Messico” because they have such a different culture from America. Just two basic issue - we are secure in person and property. They are not.
No statistical cherry picking can cover the vast (and increasing) gap between the pool of ever deepening cess that is Mexico and that which America is.
Even after having allowed collectivists to infiltrate our schools, agencies, and most all public offices, the American way is not aceptent of “La Mordita” (Messican for “bribe”.
I will accept the term discriminating, as I most assuredly apply value judgments, but I must reject your hopefully casual/inaccurate use of “racist”.
When Mexico stops acting like the “Indigenous Savages” from whence they are derived, and when they manage not squander what is the 12th largest national income on developing their “inner savage”, I assure you I will be more happy about such positive change than most.
I have seen once idyllic rural communities in America infested with illegals from Central America, many from Mexico. Places like Cresenct City now have MS13 grafitti and the last graduating class was 85% Mexican, as one of the realtors admitted. A drive through the area makes his position unassailable.
You do not find expressions like ‘derived from “Indigenous Savages” and “Cannibal ancestors”’ in any way racist?
Granted, before the Conquest, in Europe, some 18 million people had been butchered in the hundred years’ war, and a hundred years after the Conquest, some 8 million people were butchered in the 30 years’ war. But though the “indigenous savages” of Europe had no reservations about slaughtering women and children, at least they didn’t eat them, which means we are not at all like our “non-cannibal savage ancestors” in America today.