Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Tex-Con-Man; All
ahahahah

It's NOT the house but WE are not going to back up our claim with any evidence - just take our word for it ‘cause we say so.

I found the Gilbert documentary to be pretty seamless - and the evidence has ALL been out there - in pieces - for anyone who has been paying attention.

Gilbert took all those puzzle pieces and completed the picture. It was DAVIS who was intricately tied up with the Dunham family - who took the photos - (BTW, did I miss where this writer disproves that the photos ARE of Ann? - that’;s the salient question.) .

It was Davis who was the prominent male figure in ‘bummer's life, his teacher/companion/mentor through high school - it was to Davis's Chicago circle of communists that ‘bummer was folded into...and it is THEIR cause that he was programmed to carry out. He is a PPP - Pretty Programmed Puppet who has his two commie handlers at his side - predominantly Vallerie - hard core commie (daddy and Davis friends)who introduced mooseShell and bummer and it is Vallerie who is the real power, makes the decisions, in the O office.

It is the facial similarities, structure, to Davis (I'm a portrait artist, trained in familial characteristics - he has NO similarities to the Kenyan.) He did inherit the longer face from the Dunham side, but the underlying muscle structure that results in unique expressions, is striking. And unless Ann had a twin, it's quite evident that Davis's model is the daughter of his friend, Stanley D.

Gilbert has handed us the puzzle box top - with the whole picture - so we can see how the box full of pieces fit together.

The bummer camp have tried desperately to scrub this documentary from being seen...the producers were wise enough to first send out millions of copies to the public so that when their links are shut down and the YouTube clips are scrubbed over and over, new ones pop up. They can't contain it. So they're trying to discredit it. Hopefully, people will actually WATCH the film before swallowing the flimsy rhetoric of the spin-doctors tasked with damage control. There isn[t much in the film that can't be found if one does due diligence, even WITH the massive scrub-machine that has been on overtime ever since - or before - bummer took office.

8 posted on 10/06/2012 8:39:42 AM PDT by maine-iac7 (Christian is as Christian does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: maine-iac7
Apparently you haven't read the entire series (See post #1).

The author addresses the photo and proves it couldn't be Stanley Ann Dunham.

Read through all 7 and get back to me.

10 posted on 10/06/2012 8:47:45 AM PDT by Tex-Con-Man (T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: maine-iac7
(BTW, did I miss where this writer disproves that the photos ARE of Ann? - that’;s the salient question.) .

If you can take LorenC at his word, he did disprove that the seven photographs that Gilbert found are Stanley Ann. LorenC claims to have found one of them in a 1958 men's magazine, making it impossible for them to be Stanley Ann.

There is still a real possibility that the woman in the Original three photographs is not the same woman in the subsequently discovered Gilbert Photographs, but I would not put a great deal of confidence in this possibility.

22 posted on 10/06/2012 6:18:18 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson