2) Even if it were conceded that the photos did indeed depict the house at 2994 Kalihi, the next inevitable objection would be that he and I had simply omitted pictures of some part of the house. A particular room, or even just a particular angle of a room. So once again, people would find a reason to conclude the pictures were unsatisfactory.
I don't have a dog in this fight, but in this era of digital movie cameras and YouTube, why would still photos be argued for/against?
A movie starting with the house owner, showing the house exterior and address, followed by a complete house walk-through would be a better product to argue "it's not this house", wouldn't it?