All that effort and all you’ve achieved is to slander a dead woman..... jeez, dude, get a life.
You’ve got a major attention span problem I guess, I’m the last one to have slandered anyone, I’ve spent all my time and worn out my welcome in the process on FR by trying to show that the model wasn’t Stanley Ann Dunham. My last comment was sarcasm. Loren C is going to get nowhere with his denials that S.A.D. posed naked - JUST LIKE I GOT NOWHERE. There’s a certain sector that includes Jerome Corsi and Kincaid who prefer the FMD-AS-FATHER theory and to make that work, Stanley Ann just has to be the girl who took her clothes off, never mind that the first images from one of the magazines Joel Gilbert names was dated 1958, according to Loren C (banned freeper) in his latest update, to which I posted a link.
You might gain some insights if you read through this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2920965/posts
I think we made it clear in that, Gilbert’s story is fake, but it’s been chosen as useful and has gained so much traction, any quest for truth might as well be forgotten. What we see now looks like fighting lies with lies, and for that, I’m not responsible - but I am laughing.
It’s quite obvious to me now that anyone who thinks for themselves and doesn’t march lockstep with one side or the other, is going to get attacked from both sides. I’m an Aussie and I’m wondering how you all got so programmed.
And don’t tell me to get a life, I’ve got one, thank you.