Ryan: “Now that it’s done, we should not reverse it. I think that would be a step in the wrong direction because people have already disclosed themselves.”
“I think this issue is past us,” he added. “It’s done. And I think we need to move on.”
If he does not support open homosexuality in the military, and he says the issue is past us, it’s done - meaning homosexuals serving openly in the military is here to stay - and that we need to move on from the issue - then by default he is okay with open homosexuality continuing as policy in the military.
I have no clue how such pretzel logic works in people who insist he is not for something that he just emphatically stated is ‘done and we need to move on’. He is obviously OKAY with the issue remaining as policy or he would continue to oppose it.
Such a position reveals our legitimate concern that NOTHING Obama has already done is going to get repealed under Romney. Not ObamaCare, not a zillion czars, not defacto Amnesty, not buku bucks for the Muslim Brotherhood - because hey - the issues are past us, we should not reverse them, it’s time to move on.
Mark it. That will be the reality under Romney. Marxism simply gets a new master at the helm.
There’s the future - not a dime’s worth of difference. Evil remains, just under a different party banner.
Personally I believe in the original Constitutional requirement that only land-owners/taxpayers should have the right to vote... but it’s changed, the issue is past us. The doesn’t mean I’m “okay” with it.
I can’t believe I have to explain this to an adult, but there is a difference between supporting something personally and being resigned to something that you disagree with but can’t change.
Please stop lying about Ryan’s position.