This looks to be the ultimate case. Well articulated history of the NBC legal term of art and most of the best case law showing concern about foreign influence, smack down of Ankeny, clarification or WKA, affidavit from Arpaio stating forgery of the only source document indicating a US birth, incorporation by reference of Corsi’s “Where's the Birth Certificate” including Danae’s redacted docs proving that Barry and Hawaii were lying about not being able to produce his BC for years, demand for discovery prior allowing Barry on the ballot, and request for oral argument that could focus media on all of this before the election.
A judge gets this put on his desk, with affidavits from law enforcement insisting there are fraudulent documents. A judge with ethics would simply call all of them into his court, and demand to see the evidence of fraud, and let the president answer to the evidence. No spin. No bullshit. Very simple.
Yet even if his purported "birth certificate" is to be believed, Appellee Obama was born to a mother who was a citizen of the United States, and a father who was a Kenyan citizen.
Unless Klayman believes that Barry was born sometime late 1963 or later (1961 isn't listed in the appeal other than by inference), then why would Klayman state that Barry was born to a father who was a "Kenyan" (in 1961)...when "Kenya" hadn't gained their independence yet in 1961.
He should have stipulated that Barry was born to British subject father.