A "thorough review" would be to get Hawaii to send you a certified 'true and accurate' record along with it amendments, and truthfully vet Obama on the intent and meaning of the natural born citizen clause. Anything else is political game playing.
Did Obama wrote the Constitution?
Perhaps someone can explain this to me.
If you or I applied for a driver’s license in Kansas, we would be required to submit verifiable, documentary proof of identity and residency. No proof, no license. The State doesn’t have the burden of proving us wrong, nor will the State collect the data for us.
So why do S.O.S. Kobach, et al., keep asking Hawaii for anything, and trying to collect the data themselves, instead of requiring those who seek to put Obama on the ballot to submit verifiable, documentary proof of his eligibility? Logically, it should be The Kansas SOS should establish “No proof, no ballot access” (with reasonable forms and clear doumentary requirements) as official policy for all candidates seeking ballot access, publish the fact, and legally notify the candidates. Those who object to providing common documents can sue, and explain in court why it should take more to get a driver’s license than to be President of the United States.