Do you remember when Sellin’s article came out? Was it posted on Canada Free Press? I’d like to read it.
It is obvious that they all know DBA 0bama is not eligible and none of them are touching it. Cowards, assistants, traitors.
Furthermore, the vast majority of voters don't know anything about Mr. Zullo and don't know if he's a credible investigator. Most of the voters don't even know much about Sheriff Joe Arpaio and don't know that Joe is the sheriff of Maricopa County, AZ, which is the location of Phoenix, it's surrounding suburbs, and over 4 million people (the majority of Arizona's population). The voters don't know that Sheriff Arpaio runs a very large police agency with highly sophisticated investigative methods. Thus the voters don't fully realize that Arpaio is a very solid and competent guy, and the voters don't understand that simply because Arpaio selected him that means Zullo is very probably also an outstanding police detective.
So this investigation by Zullo is perceived by most voters as a murky bunch of uncertainties and possibilities, but not as hard comprehensible evidence that the White House staff posted a forgery on the White House website. And keep in mind folks that in electoral politics, perception matters much more than absolute truth. In the 1-4 year timeframe of politics, it's how an issue is perceived by voters that counts, not what is actually true. In the very long historical timeframe, the truth will ultimately surface about where Obama was born and whether he's really eligible to be President of the US. But Boehner and McConnnell have to deal with voter perceptions over the next 1-50 months and they know that a highly public investigation into Obama's birthplace would be a wild gamble politically that could be perceived as just a partisan witch-hunt by most of the voters (especially considering how the MSM would spin the coverage of such an investigation.) That's why they're not going to touch this investigation, because of how it could be perceived. All of this investigating in Hawaii and in the British National Archives should have been done back in 2007 and 2008 before the Obama/McCain election, but unfortunately conservative investigators didn't get it all done back then (and I realize of course that new evidence has emerged since 2008). The best plan of attack for conservatives is to let the new media people like WorldNet and some of the talk radio people work on this issue. But congressional Republicans are right to not start this investigation.
BTW, I don't buy any of the talk that McCain didn't make an all-out effort to win in 2008 or that Romney isn't making an all-out effort to win right now. Romney certainly is fighting as hard as he can to win and at this point I give Romney a 70% chance of winning. It won't be a landslide but he can definitely win a fairly close election.