"Four years ago the Democrat National Committee refused to certify that Barack Obama was “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.”
I don't believe that is true.
As I recall, there were two different Certifications sent out to the 57 (strike that) 50 states. The first was sent to all 50. One state rejected that Certification: Hawaii. They were sent a second version with the language noted above removed.
Yeah...and they had the same typo at the end of the second line....though instead of the correct spelling through.....
....crickets...
I wonder if they will make the same mistake this time around.....snicker.
I think you have that backwards. I may be wrong, but as I remember it:
1. The phrase “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.” was not included on the original DNC certification to the 50 States.
2. Hawaii rejected that because they have a state law that requires the phrase/statement.
3. The Hawaii State DNC Chair refused to sign the new certification with the “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.” statement, but would not give a reason.
4. The Hawaii AG and some other high ups got together and approved the certification without the required DNC Chair’s signature.
At least, that’s what I remember reading about on some threads here on FR. Here’s one of the original articles:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/14583
There are more, and FR has threads in the archives - about April-June, 2011.