Paul is not a truther. He has been highly reluctant to repudiate those followers who are.
You can say Paultard all you want, but the GOP just nominated a RINO, a socialized medicine advocate, and a social moderate that has been on both sides of every major issue.
I’d take Paul any day over Romney. In any event, the article was not praising Paul, but arguing that the movement has to get beyond him.
but since you did - why is he reluctant to repudiate them? part of the ‘we need to deceive’ platform?
ron paul is a fool and would be worse than obama
so you have said reagan was a deceiver - that you need to deceive so you can get power
your problem is NOT ron paul - its your wackjob ideas that you can't defend - while claiming to be the only ones that understand the constitution, you ignore what it says
and now - a romney distraction - and again - sad