Why the hell should he go on FOX? So Hannity can try to browbeat him into resigning again? The liberal media will actually give him a fairer shake because the Republican media has their RNC-provided talking points on hand to try to destroy him, the same ones FOX marched in lockstep with to push Romney to the nomination. Absolutely nobody is as brutal to conservatives as the Republican media when they want to be. Just ask Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum. At least CNN hasn't banned Newt from the channel just because he honestly said Fox was biased towards Romney, something it didn't take a rocket scientist to notice. Keep in mind, Fox used the same RNC talking point question on every show at the time, "So, Newt and Rick, when are you dropping out and will you support Romney if he wins?" Romney was never asked if he'd support the other candidates if they won.
Oh, and, is Romney only going to do interviews with Fox? Is he going to ignore NBC, CNN, CBS and ABC in his campaign? Great way to get his message out, huh? Will you vow now to call Romney out as unqualified to be a candidate if he does an interview with CNN, ABC, CBS, etc?
That won't happen. The party establishment have had other plans for that seat for quite some time that did not include the three who ran for it. Here from the Post Dispatch March 2012:
Post-Dispatch: A group of influential Republicans headed by former Sen. John Danforth and fundraisining dynamo Sam Fox are pressing state auditor Tom Schweich to join the already crowded primary contest for Missouris GOP nomination for the Senate....The[ir] letter demonstrates a lack of faith in the potential of the trio of GOP contestants vying to take on McCaskill, whose vulnerabilities have showed up in public and private polls. Former state Treasurer Sarah Steelman, of Rolla, U.S. Rep. Todd Akin, of Wildwood, and wealthy St. Louis businessman John Brunner are competing to challenge McCaskill.
Got the picture now???