I wouldn't say that.
height="450">
Another point: As I understood it, the major number of deaths in Aurora were not from the 5.56 semi-auto, but from a shotgun.
If that is true, the whole “AW” argument is additionally proven - again - to be all a lie.....
But what else is new with the libs? It’s all lies, all the time....
Automobile fatality’s rival all gun fatality’s combined.
Ban Assault Prious’s!
Anyone who doesn’t think that there are assault weapons hasn’t seen one of these.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmtiger
I’d like two T shirts. One would say: I could hear you better if you pulled your head out of your ass.
The other would say: Don’t get behind me. I always end up in the slowest line.
A broom stick can be an “assault broom stick” if I use it in an assault...
It’s a shame we even have to convince people to value their God given inalienable birth right to own assault rifles and every other implement of war. I prefer to ignore them but that isn’t as useful as converting them. I suppose I would offer to take this individual to the range and help him get over his his irrational fear with an afternoon of shooting metal silhouettes.
As they say on National Palisimain Radio, “Lets’s do the numbers.”
100 rounds in 3 seconds = 33.3 per second.
33.3 X 60 = 1998 rounds per minute.
1998 rounds per minute = rotary cannon, NOT a mere ‘assault weapon.”
the term ‘assault weapon’ is not a technical term describing an actual type of firearm but rather a political term denoting whatever firearm the anti-gun crowd wishes to demonize, regulate, and ban at a given point in time.
It’s worse than that – given the definitions:
Assault
1 to attack someone in a violent way
Weapon
1 something that you use to fight with or attack someone with, such as a knife, bomb, or gun
An assault weapon could be any object that could be used as a weapon to assault or attack someone. It could apply to almost anything deemed to be a Weapon.
I wouldn't say that.
height="450">