Posted on 08/17/2012 10:06:45 AM PDT by Biggirl
If Romney wins, how does Hillary stay in the spotlight for the next four years?
In 2016, we’ll have to remind black voters how Hillary turned her back on Obama in his hour of deepest need. It’s racist.
Consider for a moment Richard Nixon, 1962 to 1967, he suffered two devastating losses, yet rose again in '68 to become President. He spent those years in NYC, close to the real power people behind the scenes.
Hillary is well positioned to both hob knob with the real power and stay in the public limelight through various means: TV, public appearances, as a 'talking head' etc. She is banking on an Obama defeat, count on it.
I like the way you think.
By pushing her unqualified daughter. Hillary is slippery and will do anything.
So is Soros and others.
In 2016, well have to remind democrats how Hillary turned her back on Obama and the party in their hour of deepest need. It was pure selfishness on her part.
It’s also their next step on the road to serfdom uh communism. Sure hope Romney/Ryan are who they say they are.
Hillary can’t stomach the thought of a black man in the White House for another four years. It’s racist.
Could you elaborate?
Obama honored Hillary by making her Secretary of State, and this is how she repays him? Such disloyalty! Such racism!
Like Don Vito said: "keep your friends close and your enemies closer"
I think Hillary will run for president in 2016. Huma Abedin will be her VP. Would love to get fresh news from the freepers. I just started a site called http://cramerchronicles.com/...
The Chicago machine is in a total panic over the wipeout that will be slow Joe getting waxed by Ryan in the debate....that will be the final stand for the Obama regime...
We were tossing out ideas of how we could frame this situation to alienate black voters from Hillary in 2016. The Hillary was disloyal line could work, but not if you preface the whole thing with "SOS was not an honor."
No doubt the press will continually mention that had Hillary been on the ticket this time around, that Romney wouldn't have won. Other than being appointed to a vacated Senate seat from NY (Cuomo could appoint her), she'd have to start appearing regularly on the Sunday morning programs, or she'd have to take a job as an analyst with one of the tv networks.
If all the Dems can come up with in 2-3 years is Hillary, then they're more desperate than I thought. Unfortunately though, the Dems don't look to qualifications when picking their candidates. They rely on the diversity factor. She's about the only well-known female Democrat out there at the moment. Her Senate record isn't anything to brag about, nor is her time as Secretary of State anything to write home about. If anything, her and Obama have made our standing in the world even worse, and appeased the terrorists around the globe. Bush ended up with the results of the security lapses under Clinton. I pity Romney, because he will have to deal with what Obama and his minions have wrought.
Hey that’s not fair! Chelsea is just as qualified as her mother.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.